BibleVerse · Map of Meaning
Revelation 18 is drawn toward prophetic books
Its highest chapter-level similarity is with Jeremiah 51 in this dataset.
BibleVerse research
A computational map of similarities among Bible chapters
Explore similarities between Bible chapters in an interactive map. Each dot represents a chapter, positioned using a computer model's comparison of its language. Select a chapter to read it, or highlight a book to explore its connections.

A quick way into the research
These are model-based similarities, not claims of shared authorship or identical theology. Each card opens the relevant view or analysis so you can inspect the chapters and the limits of the comparison.
BibleVerse · Map of Meaning
Its highest chapter-level similarity is with Jeremiah 51 in this dataset.
BibleVerse · Map of Meaning
The chapter appears near Ecclesiastes and Proverbs in the model's layout.
BibleVerse · Map of Meaning
Its family list places it near genealogies in 1 Chronicles, apart from most of Matthew.
BibleVerse · Map of Meaning
Leviticus 16 is its second-closest chapter by the underlying similarity score.
BibleVerse · Map of Meaning
Daniel 6 to 7 and Isaiah 39 to 40 are among the notable internal transitions tested.
Each dot is one chapter: 1,189 of them, from Genesis 1 to Revelation 22. The layout aims to place chapters with similar numerical representations near one another. Distances are approximate, so use the chapter links and similarity scores to explore a connection. The legend under the map says what the colors mean in the view you are looking at.
Paste up to 600 characters: a verse, a prayer or a paragraph of your own. The site's search model turns the text into the same kind of numbers as the chapters and finds the ten chapters whose representations are most similar. A diamond marks the similarity-weighted center of those ten. The scores are similarities between representations, not a judgment of the text, and the map itself is not recomputed.
Drag to turn, or use the arrow keys. Hover or tap a dot for its chapter.
The map can be colored six ways, and any view can be switched to any of them. By testament: two colors for the Old and New Testaments, using Christian terminology. By section: seven colors for the seven sections, cool colors for the Old Testament and warm ones for the New, or three colors for the Jewish order. By the groups a view calls out, so that Samuel and Kings and Chronicles, or the four Gospels, each take their own color. By book, one of seven colors repeating in order so that neighboring books differ. By groups calculated without using testament or section labels in the clustering step, which is a way to ask whether it sees the same shape readers do. And by the surprises, the chapters that sit with another section, colored by the section that draws them.
Choose a book under the map and its chapters appear numbered, pale at the first chapter and deep at the last, with the rest of the map faded. The map turns to the angle that spreads the book widest and zooms in to fit it. Under the figure: the book's two most alike chapters and its two least alike, the book nearest to it and the book farthest from it, and every chapter listed with the chapter outside the book that sits nearest to it and the chapter inside the book it is least like. Some books form compact groups; others spread across the map. These patterns can provide starting points for comparing their chapters.
The map can carry two sets of labels. Seven sections is the familiar Protestant arrangement: Law, History, Poetry and Wisdom, Prophets, Gospels and Acts, Letters, Revelation. The Jewish grouping labels the Hebrew Bible as Torah, Prophets and Writings, and shows the New Testament in gray. This changes the grouping labels, not the underlying Christian translation or its book and chapter divisions. It is not a separate analysis of a Jewish edition.
Each view is an angle, a coloring and a caption that says what to look for. Open one on the map above, or study every view here as a still picture.
Imagine every chapter of the Bible is a person at a very big party. People who like talking about the same things stand together. The songs stand with the songs. The letters stand with the letters. The stories about kings stand with the other stories about kings.
This picture is that party. Every dot is one chapter. Choose "Testament" under the map and the blue dots represent the Old Testament and the orange dots represent the New Testament. Choose "Section" and each kind of book gets its own color.
Things to find:
Now turn the map. Find two crowds that are touching. Turn it again. Are they still touching? Sometimes two crowds only look like they are touching because of where you are standing. That is a good thing to remember about maps.
A computer read every chapter of the Bible and gave each one a place on this map. It did not read the way you do. It has read a very large amount of English, and from that it learned patterns used to represent and compare text. When it reads a chapter, it turns it into a long list of numbers that describe what the chapter is about. Two chapters with similar lists land near each other.
That is enough to see some real things:
Some chapters appear apart from the rest of their book. Matthew 1 begins with a genealogy, and it sits with the family trees of Genesis and Chronicles, far from the rest of Matthew. James 3 is about the tongue, and it sits with the Proverbs. 2 Samuel 22 is a song David sang, and it sits with the Psalms; it closely parallels Psalm 18, with some differences in wording.
Try this: choose one book under the map. Find the chapter that sits furthest from the others. Open it and work out why. Then find a book that sits somewhere you did not expect. The map is a good way to ask questions; the text is where the answers are.
The model used for this map also powers the site's search by meaning. Give it a passage of English and it answers with a list of 768 numbers. That list is not a summary you could read: an individual number is not a labeled topic or an independently readable measure of meaning. The numbers work together, like coordinates, to represent patterns learned from a large training dataset, and two passages that share ideas end up with lists that point in nearly the same direction, even when they share few words.
This page keeps the first 256 of the 768. That is not a shortcut invented here. The model was trained so that its list can be cut short from the end and still work: the first numbers carry most of what the whole list carries, the way a rough sketch keeps the outline while the later numbers add detail. Keeping 256 makes every comparison cheaper, at a small cost in precision that the model's makers publish, and the site's search keeps the same 256, so the map and the search see the same numbers.
For this map, every chapter was cut into overlapping windows of four verses, each window was turned into its numbers, and the chapter took the average. That gives 1,189 points in a space with 256 dimensions. You cannot draw that. So a method called UMAP was used to squash the 256 dimensions down to three, keeping each chapter's nearest neighbors as close as it can, and this page draws those three.
That last step is the one to understand, because it is where the map can mislead. Think of a globe pressed flat into a map of the world: Greenland looks larger than it is, and Alaska and Russia, which face each other across the Bering Strait, land at opposite edges. Every flat map of something round stretches some distances and hides others. This map is a shadow of a shape you cannot see whole, and turning it shows you a different shadow each time. Two groups that touch from one angle pull apart from another. That is why the map lets you turn it: to distinguish apparent overlaps from separation in the three-dimensional layout. Rotation cannot recover information lost when the original 256 dimensions were reduced to three.
There is one more thing to try before reading on. Choose "Computed groups" under the map. These seven groups were calculated from the chapter representations without supplying testament or section labels to the clustering step. Seven was chosen in advance, not discovered by the algorithm. One group contains most New Testament chapters. Then the Psalms as a group of their own, the histories as one, the Law in two, and the prophets together with Job, Proverbs and Ecclesiastes. Some groups overlap with familiar sections; others cross those boundaries. For example, Acts 7 and Matthew 1 group with chapters from Genesis and Exodus. Shared vocabulary and literary form may help explain these associations, but the grouping alone cannot establish their cause.
What does a cluster show? It identifies chapters grouped together by this model and these settings. Shared wording, topics or literary forms may help explain a grouping, but it is not proof of shared meaning. It does not prove that they were written together, or that they teach the same thing, or that one quotes another, though the map finds many chapters that do. The two sections below show how well the map's sense of "similar" matches what readers have known for centuries, and where it produces something new to look at.
Several biblical books contain parallel passages. Kings and Chronicles recount overlapping events, while Matthew, Mark and Luke share many accounts of Jesus' life and teaching. Psalm 18 closely parallels 2 Samuel 22. Ezra and Nehemiah carry the same list of returning families. These familiar parallels offer useful examples against which to check the model's similarity scores.
The strongest pair is Obadiah and Zephaniah at 0.868, and the minor prophets fill the top of the list: the six strongest pairs are all among Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Micah and Zephaniah. The first New Testament pair is 2 Peter and Jude at 0.840, seventh on the list. Of the forty, 23 are pairs of letters, 13 pairs of prophets and four pairs of Gospels; every pair sits inside one section of one testament. The strongest pair across the testaments, Proverbs and James at 0.787, ranks 100th of 2,145. Development comparisons with an earlier model retained several familiar parallels but changed other relationships, both within and between the testaments, and this was not a comprehensive test of stability across models; the cross-testament link shown here is one reading with one model.
| # | First book | Second book | Average score | Chapter pairs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Obadiah | Zephaniah | 0.868 | 3 |
| 2 | Obadiah | Micah | 0.864 | 7 |
| 3 | Micah | Zephaniah | 0.858 | 21 |
| 4 | Joel | Zephaniah | 0.851 | 9 |
| 5 | Amos | Obadiah | 0.845 | 9 |
| 6 | Joel | Obadiah | 0.844 | 3 |
| 7 | 2 Peter | Jude | 0.840 | 3 |
| 8 | Amos | Zephaniah | 0.839 | 27 |
| 9 | Mark | Luke | 0.838 | 384 |
| 10 | Ephesians | 1 Peter | 0.836 | 30 |
| 11 | 2 Thessalonians | 1 Peter | 0.834 | 15 |
| 12 | 2 John | 3 John | 0.834 | 1 |
| 13 | Philippians | 2 Thessalonians | 0.833 | 12 |
| 14 | Ephesians | Colossians | 0.831 | 24 |
| 15 | Ephesians | Philippians | 0.831 | 24 |
| 16 | Ephesians | 2 Thessalonians | 0.830 | 18 |
| 17 | Joel | Micah | 0.829 | 21 |
| 18 | Amos | Micah | 0.827 | 63 |
| 19 | Philippians | 2 Timothy | 0.826 | 16 |
| 20 | Philippians | Philemon | 0.826 | 4 |
| 21 | Philippians | 1 Peter | 0.826 | 20 |
| 22 | 1 Thessalonians | 2 Thessalonians | 0.826 | 15 |
| 23 | 1 John | 2 John | 0.823 | 5 |
| 24 | James | Jude | 0.822 | 5 |
| 25 | Philippians | Colossians | 0.821 | 16 |
| 26 | Ephesians | 1 John | 0.821 | 30 |
| 27 | Isaiah | Obadiah | 0.820 | 66 |
| 28 | Joel | Amos | 0.819 | 27 |
| 29 | Colossians | 1 Peter | 0.819 | 20 |
| 30 | Nahum | Zephaniah | 0.817 | 9 |
| 31 | Colossians | 2 Thessalonians | 0.816 | 12 |
| 32 | Isaiah | Zephaniah | 0.815 | 198 |
| 33 | Matthew | Luke | 0.815 | 672 |
| 34 | 2 Thessalonians | Jude | 0.813 | 3 |
| 35 | 1 Peter | Jude | 0.813 | 5 |
| 36 | Matthew | Mark | 0.812 | 448 |
| 37 | Mark | John | 0.812 | 336 |
| 38 | 2 Timothy | 1 Peter | 0.811 | 20 |
| 39 | Titus | 1 Peter | 0.811 | 15 |
| 40 | James | 1 Peter | 0.810 | 25 |
| 100 | Proverbs | James | 0.787 | 155 |
These are the closest pairs of chapters from different books, measured in the full 256 numbers rather than on the drawn map. The score is cosine similarity, which ranges from -1 to 1; a chapter compared with itself scores 1. The scores shown here are positive. They are not percentages of shared meaning.
| # | Chapters | Score | What they share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 Kings 19 and Isaiah 37 | 0.993 | Sennacherib's threat and Hezekiah's prayer, the same account in both books |
| 2 | 2 Samuel 22 and Psalm 18 | 0.992 | David's song, in the story and in the songbook |
| 3 | Ezra 2 and Nehemiah 7 | 0.989 | The list of families who returned from exile, given twice |
| 4 | Matthew 26 and Mark 14 | 0.987 | The Last Supper, Gethsemane and the arrest |
| 5 | 2 Samuel 10 and 1 Chronicles 19 | 0.984 | The war with the Ammonites |
| 6 | 2 Samuel 7 and 1 Chronicles 17 | 0.983 | God's promise to David |
| 7 | 1 Kings 8 and 2 Chronicles 6 | 0.979 | Solomon's prayer at the dedication of the temple |
| 8 | 2 Samuel 8 and 1 Chronicles 18 | 0.977 | David's victories and his officials |
| 9 | 1 Kings 10 and 2 Chronicles 9 | 0.976 | The queen of Sheba |
| 10 | Matthew 24 and Mark 13 | 0.976 | Jesus on the end of the age |
| 11 | 2 Kings 25 and Jeremiah 52 | 0.970 | The fall of Jerusalem, told at the end of both books |
| 12 | Mark 12 and Luke 20 | 0.970 | The questions put to Jesus in the temple |
Other useful comparisons include Psalm 14 and Psalm 53, closely related versions of a psalm with a score of 0.981. As a within-book pair, they are not in the cross-book table. Exodus 20 and Deuteronomy 5, two accounts of the Ten Commandments, score 0.955 and appear in the full table. Jude and 2 Peter 2 share closely related warnings; they are each other's nearest chapter in this dataset, at 0.890, below the top forty.
These parallel passages were not supplied as labels during this analysis. However, we cannot rule out the pretrained model's exposure to biblical texts or discussions of them. Recovering familiar parallels is a useful check, but each additional connection still needs to be examined.
The other end of the scale is as telling. The lowest-scoring chapter pair in this dataset is Esther 10, three verses on the king's tribute and Mordecai's greatness, and Psalm 150, six verses calling everything that breathes to praise: a brief closing narrative and a song of praise. Nearly every pair at this end is the same contrast, Esther against a psalm. Esther 10 is the least alike chapter for 543 of the Bible's 1,189 chapters; Psalm 150 is for 108; Leviticus 13, the laws on skin disease, is for 98. The Bible's language runs from records to praise, and a few very short chapters sit at the far ends of it.
| Books | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Most alike books | Obadiah and Zephaniah | 0.868 |
| Obadiah and Micah | 0.864 | |
| Micah and Zephaniah | 0.858 | |
| Least alike books | Esther and Philemon | 0.373 |
| Esther and 2 John | 0.386 | |
| Esther and 1 John | 0.388 |
The minor prophets are each other's nearest books: Obadiah, Zephaniah, Micah and Joel share a form and a vocabulary. Esther, whose Hebrew text does not explicitly name God (unlike its Greek additions), has low similarity to the Letters in this analysis5 and it has the lowest average chapter similarity to more than half the books in the dataset: 35 of the 66 books have Esther as the book least like them.
Two more measures, both from the same numbers. The chapter with the highest average similarity to the other chapters in this dataset is Deuteronomy 32, the Song of Moses, which includes themes of creation, rescue, rebellion, judgment and mercy. After it come Psalm 78, Jeremiah 17, Psalm 105 and Nehemiah 9, and three of those four are themselves retellings of Israel's story. The chapter with the lowest similarity to its own nearest match is Psalm 133, three verses on brothers living in unity, followed by Esther 10 and Nehemiah 3, the list of who built which stretch of the wall.
| # | Chapter | Least alike chapter | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Esther 10 | Psalms 150 | 0.147 |
| 2 | Esther 2 | Psalms 150 | 0.191 |
| 3 | Esther 10 | Psalms 142 | 0.195 |
| 4 | Esther 10 | Psalms 6 | 0.196 |
| 5 | Esther 10 | Psalms 43 | 0.214 |
| 6 | Esther 10 | Psalms 143 | 0.215 |
| 7 | Esther 1 | Psalms 150 | 0.217 |
| 8 | Esther 10 | Psalms 88 | 0.218 |
| 9 | Esther 10 | Psalms 70 | 0.219 |
| 10 | Exodus 26 | Esther 10 | 0.220 |
| 11 | Genesis 5 | Acts 25 | 0.224 |
| 12 | Esther 10 | Psalms 38 | 0.227 |
| 13 | 2 Chronicles 27 | Psalms 142 | 0.229 |
| 14 | Psalms 150 | Jeremiah 41 | 0.232 |
| 15 | Esther 10 | Psalms 3 | 0.233 |
| 16 | Esther 10 | Psalms 23 | 0.233 |
| 17 | Esther 10 | Psalms 54 | 0.234 |
| 18 | Esther 10 | Psalms 61 | 0.235 |
| 19 | Jeremiah 41 | 1 Corinthians 13 | 0.238 |
| 20 | Esther 10 | Psalms 86 | 0.239 |
| # | Chapter | Mean similarity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deuteronomy 32 | 0.746 |
| 2 | Psalms 78 | 0.726 |
| 3 | Jeremiah 17 | 0.726 |
| 4 | Psalms 105 | 0.725 |
| 5 | Nehemiah 9 | 0.724 |
| 6 | Isaiah 41 | 0.723 |
| 7 | Amos 5 | 0.722 |
| 8 | Isaiah 1 | 0.721 |
| 9 | Isaiah 8 | 0.721 |
| 10 | Ezekiel 24 | 0.720 |
| # | Chapter | Its nearest | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Psalms 133 | Proverbs 27 | 0.653 |
| 2 | Esther 10 | Esther 8 | 0.698 |
| 3 | Nehemiah 3 | Nehemiah 11 | 0.731 |
| 4 | 2 Chronicles 26 | 2 Kings 15 | 0.734 |
| 5 | Job 25 | Job 15 | 0.737 |
| 6 | Jonah 3 | Jonah 4 | 0.750 |
| 7 | Ruth 1 | Ruth 2 | 0.759 |
| 8 | Genesis 38 | Genesis 30 | 0.761 |
| 9 | Revelation 12 | Revelation 17 | 0.761 |
| 10 | Judges 12 | Judges 11 | 0.761 |
| Books | Score |
|---|---|
| Obadiah and Zephaniah | 0.868 |
| Obadiah and Micah | 0.864 |
| Micah and Zephaniah | 0.858 |
| Joel and Zephaniah | 0.851 |
| Amos and Obadiah | 0.845 |
| Joel and Obadiah | 0.844 |
| 2 Peter and Jude | 0.840 |
| Amos and Zephaniah | 0.839 |
| Books | Score |
|---|---|
| Esther and Philemon | 0.373 |
| Esther and 2 John | 0.386 |
| Esther and 1 John | 0.388 |
| Esther and 1 Thessalonians | 0.400 |
| Esther and 1 Timothy | 0.401 |
| Esther and Ephesians | 0.401 |
| Esther and Philippians | 0.405 |
| Esther and 2 Thessalonians | 0.410 |
Scores are cosine similarities in the 256-dimensional representations, not percentages of shared meaning. Book scores are the average similarity of every chapter pair across the two books. Every figure in this section is in the data file and checked against it; the extremes are recomputed over every pair of chapters.
Fifty-eight chapters sit among another section's chapters: six or more of their ten nearest neighbors, in the full measure, belong to a section other than their own. These associations may reflect shared wording, subject matter or literary form. They do not show that a chapter belongs in a different canonical section.
On the first score, short chapters do not sit at the ends. Among the 119 least typical chapters, six have fewer than ten verses, or 5%, about the share of such chapters overall (71 of 1,189, or 6%). The lowest of all is Esther 10 (three verses) at 0.391, but next comes Genesis 5, a genealogy of 32 verses, at 0.434, and seven of the lowest ten are lists, measurements and detailed laws: that genealogy, the camp in Numbers 2, the laws on skin disease in Leviticus 13, the altar and courtyard in Exodus 27, the temple in Ezekiel 40, 41 and 42. Psalm 117, the shortest chapter at two verses, sits at 0.518, the 50th lowest of 1,189. At the top, Deuteronomy 32, 52 verses, is the most typical chapter at 0.746.
On the second score, they do. Psalm 133 (three verses, 0.653) and Esther 10 (three verses, 0.698) have the two weakest nearest matches in this measure, and chapters of fewer than ten verses have a median nearest match of 0.861 against 0.914 for chapters of 40 verses or more; the best-matched chapter in this measure is Isaiah 37 (0.993, to 2 Kings 19). A chapter of a few verses is a smaller sample of language, and that may contribute to its weaker nearest match; the scores alone do not establish why. The same short chapters turn up at the ends of the pairwise lists (the least alike pairs, the loners) rather than at the ends of the typicality list.
| Chapter | Verses | Average similarity | Nearest match | Nearest chapter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psalm 117 | 2 | 0.518 | 0.819 | Psalm 96 |
| Esther 10 | 3 | 0.391 | 0.698 | Esther 8 |
| Psalm 133 | 3 | 0.515 | 0.653 | Proverbs 27 |
| Psalm 131 | 3 | 0.575 | 0.788 | Psalm 102 |
| Psalm 134 | 3 | 0.606 | 0.806 | Psalm 68 |
| Psalm 123 | 4 | 0.588 | 0.822 | Psalm 86 |
| Jeremiah 45 | 5 | 0.554 | 0.782 | Jeremiah 18 |
| Psalm 93 | 5 | 0.559 | 0.863 | Psalm 29 |
| Psalm 70 | 5 | 0.579 | 0.899 | Psalm 40 |
| Psalm 43 | 5 | 0.579 | 0.864 | Psalm 71 |
| Chapter | Verses | Average similarity | Nearest match | Nearest chapter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deuteronomy 32 | 52 | 0.746 | 0.920 | Psalm 78 |
| Psalm 78 | 72 | 0.726 | 0.929 | Psalm 105 |
| Jeremiah 17 | 27 | 0.726 | 0.891 | Isaiah 65 |
| Psalm 105 | 45 | 0.725 | 0.929 | Psalm 78 |
| Nehemiah 9 | 38 | 0.724 | 0.923 | Psalm 106 |
| Isaiah 41 | 29 | 0.723 | 0.922 | Isaiah 40 |
| Amos 5 | 27 | 0.722 | 0.918 | Isaiah 1 |
| Isaiah 1 | 31 | 0.721 | 0.927 | Jeremiah 6 |
| Isaiah 8 | 22 | 0.721 | 0.884 | Isaiah 30 |
| Ezekiel 24 | 27 | 0.720 | 0.899 | Jeremiah 9 |
| Chapter | Verses | Average similarity | Nearest match | Nearest chapter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psalm 133 | 3 | 0.515 | 0.653 | Proverbs 27 |
| Esther 10 | 3 | 0.391 | 0.698 | Esther 8 |
| Nehemiah 3 | 32 | 0.482 | 0.731 | Nehemiah 11 |
| 2 Chronicles 26 | 23 | 0.494 | 0.734 | 2 Kings 15 |
| Job 25 | 6 | 0.565 | 0.737 | Job 15 |
| Jonah 3 | 10 | 0.565 | 0.750 | Jonah 4 |
| Ruth 1 | 22 | 0.556 | 0.759 | Ruth 2 |
| Genesis 38 | 30 | 0.545 | 0.761 | Genesis 30 |
| Revelation 12 | 17 | 0.569 | 0.761 | Revelation 17 |
| Judges 12 | 15 | 0.519 | 0.761 | Judges 11 |
Read straight through, the similarity from one chapter to the next drops furthest at a handful of book boundaries and at a few places inside books. Of the 1,188 steps, 65 cross from one book to the next, and four of them are among the ten deepest: Esther 10 to Job 1 (0.403), Ezekiel 48 to Daniel 1 (0.489), Malachi 4 to Matthew 1 (0.521), Psalm 150 to Proverbs 1 (0.533). The step from Malachi 4 to Matthew 1, where the testaments meet, is the seventh deepest at 0.521. The deepest step inside a book is Ezekiel 39 to 40 at 0.478, where the oracles end and the vision of the temple begins.
The seams listed below are mostly not single-step drops. Five of the twelve seams are among the 100 deepest steps: Ezekiel (second), Daniel (47th), Isaiah (61st), Revelation (84th), Job (100th). The other seven are shallower; the shallowest, Zechariah 8 to 9, at 0.860, is above the average step and only the 893rd deepest of 1,188. A seam compares the chapters before it, as a group, with the chapters after it; a step compares one chapter with the next. A book can shift gradually over several chapters and still show a seam on the map.
| # | From | To | Score | Where |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Esther 10 | Job 1 | 0.403 | book boundary |
| 2 | Ezekiel 39 | Ezekiel 40 | 0.478 | a seam of section 07 |
| 3 | Ezekiel 48 | Daniel 1 | 0.489 | book boundary |
| 4 | Numbers 29 | Numbers 30 | 0.498 | inside the book |
| 5 | Ezra 2 | Ezra 3 | 0.508 | inside the book |
| 6 | Psalm 87 | Psalm 88 | 0.518 | inside the book |
| 7 | Malachi 4 | Matthew 1 | 0.521 | book boundary |
| 8 | Judges 16 | Judges 17 | 0.530 | inside the book |
| 9 | Judges 12 | Judges 13 | 0.532 | inside the book |
| 10 | Psalm 150 | Proverbs 1 | 0.533 | book boundary |
| 11 | Ezra 1 | Ezra 2 | 0.538 | inside the book |
| 12 | Nehemiah 6 | Nehemiah 7 | 0.540 | inside the book |
| 13 | Lamentations 5 | Ezekiel 1 | 0.548 | book boundary |
| 14 | Psalm 133 | Psalm 134 | 0.549 | inside the book |
| 15 | Ezekiel 1 | Ezekiel 2 | 0.553 | inside the book |
| 16 | Ezra 3 | Ezra 4 | 0.559 | inside the book |
| 17 | 1 Chronicles 9 | 1 Chronicles 10 | 0.559 | inside the book |
| 18 | Philemon 1 | Hebrews 1 | 0.561 | book boundary |
| 19 | Jeremiah 41 | Jeremiah 42 | 0.569 | inside the book |
| 20 | 2 Samuel 21 | 2 Samuel 22 | 0.571 | inside the book |
The following selected divisions between chapters correspond to separation in this layout. They were supplied for comparison, not discovered automatically, and do not establish when or by whom a book was written. For each of these, the chapters before the seam and the chapters after it sit as two groups on the map, further apart than either group is spread:
Genesis does not split so much as scatter: its first eleven chapters, the creation, the flood and the genealogies, spread across the map, and the rest, the family stories, sit together. Choose any of these books under the map to see its seam for yourself.
These studies explore similarities in the language of selected English Bible editions. Together, they offer several starting points for reading and comparison.
The groupings depend on the method. In this model's seven-group clustering, one group contains about 88% of the New Testament's chapters. Other groups bring together passages from different Old Testament sections. These are patterns in the model's representations, not a measure of theological difference.
Similar forms of writing can connect different books. Fifty-eight chapters meet the study's definition of an unexpected neighborhood. Examples include Matthew 1, which begins with a genealogy, and Exodus 15, which includes songs. The linked passages let you examine those connections in context.
Books can contain several forms of writing. The twelve examples above compare changes in the layout with changes in the text. A visual division can suggest a passage to examine; it does not establish a literary structure or a book's composition history.
Some comparisons are sensitive to chapter length. Esther 10 and Psalm 150 are the least similar pair under this measure. Deuteronomy 32 has the highest average similarity to the other chapters. Neither result makes a chapter more representative of biblical teaching or more spiritually important.
Many close parallels persist across translations. The forty closest cross-book pairs on the main map remain within each other's ten nearest chapters in the four other editions tested. Other neighboring matches change. This comparison tests chapter similarities, not whether separately drawn maps would have the same shape.
A weak search result does not establish absence. In the topic-search experiment, 921 of 1,001 titles score below the search threshold. That includes 200 of the 271 titles with literal word matches in the text. These results describe this model and these queries, not what the Bible does or does not discuss.
The sections are a human overlay. Changing them does not move a dot, and the model's own groups follow them in places and cross them in others.
Results also depend on the model. An earlier version used BGE; the current version uses EmbeddingGemma. Development comparisons retained several familiar parallels but changed other relationships, both within and between the testaments. This was not a comprehensive test of stability across models.
The companion studies explain the translation comparisons, explore books beyond the main map's Protestant canon, examine the limits of topic searches, show twelve topic searches chapter by chapter, and list the words most characteristic of the chapters the model grouped together. They do not rank traditions, canons or translations by religious value.
The text. The Berean Standard Bible, 66 books, 1,189 chapters, released into the public domain in 2023. It is the site's default edition and the text behind the site's search by meaning.
The windows. Each chapter was cut into windows of four verses, each window starting three verses after the last, so neighboring full windows share a verse. This overlap reduces abrupt boundaries but does not guarantee that a complete thought stays within one window. That gave 10,358 windows.
How the model represents a passage. Google's EmbeddingGemma model3 turns each four-verse window into a list of numbers. Passages that the model treats as similar receive similar lists. The model produces 768 numbers, but this study keeps the first 256, following the model's design for smaller representations. Google's benchmarks show a modest loss in general performance at that size, but they do not validate biblical interpretation. A chapter is represented by the average of all its windows.
How the map was drawn. UMAP2 arranged the 1,189 chapter representations in three dimensions. The study uses 50 neighbors, a minimum distance of 0.5, 500 rounds and a fixed random seed, which makes a rebuild repeatable. The view was then turned so that the Old Testament appears to the left of and above the New Testament. Rotation changes the viewing angle, not the underlying relationships.
The lists. The closest pairs across books, and the surprises, were computed from the 256 numbers, not from the drawn map: pairs by the similarity of each chapter to every other, surprises by the sections of each chapter's ten nearest neighbors.
Each chapter's neighbors and contrasts. For the book explorer, every chapter carries its five nearest chapters, its nearest chapter outside its own book and its least alike chapter inside its own book, measured in the 256 numbers. Every book carries its most and least alike pair of chapters and its nearest and farthest books, by the average similarity of every chapter pair across the two books.
How the seven groups were made. A method called k-means divided the same chapter representations into seven groups. The fixed starting point makes the result repeatable. Seven was chosen so that the computed groups could be compared with the seven familiar sections used on the page; the number seven was an editorial choice, not something the model discovered.
Two models. An earlier draft of this map was drawn with a different embedding model on the same text. The findings named on this page held: the closest pairs, the seams, the surprises, the most typical chapter and the loner. The resemblances that cross the testaments changed most, which is why the page treats them as its least settled part.
The data. Every number on this page, the coordinates of every chapter, the lists and the settings above are in one file you can download and use: semantic-map.json. The text it derives from is public domain; if you use the map, a link to this page is welcome.
This page was made with AI assistance and human review.
To cite a figure elsewhere, say which measure it is (a score in the full 256 numbers, or a position on the drawn map) and carry the translation and the model with it. Corrections are welcome through the contact page.
No. This is an exploratory comparison of language using one translation and one model. Its similarity rankings do not measure spiritual importance, establish theological agreement or replace interpretation in context.
The layout places chapters using similarities between their model-generated representations. Nearby dots suggest passages to compare, but the drawing is approximate. Read both chapters and consult their similarity scores rather than relying only on their positions.
The companion study tests chapter similarities, not new layouts. The forty closest cross-book pairs remain within each other's ten nearest chapters in all four other editions tested, but other neighboring matches change. This does not establish that separately drawn maps would have the same shape.
Chapters keep the overview manageable: this dataset has 1,189 chapter points. However, averaging passages across a chapter can obscure shorter parallels. The chapter links let you read those passages in context.
Yes. The method section links to the downloadable coordinates, computed results and settings. Please identify the translation and model when reusing them. The source Bible text is public domain; a link back to this page is welcome.
Yes. In the map's controls, the Your own text control takes up to 600 characters. The site's search model turns the text into the same kind of numbers as the chapters, finds the ten chapters whose representations are most similar, and marks the similarity-weighted center of those ten on the drawn map. The map itself is not recomputed, and the scores measure similarity between representations, not the worth or accuracy of the text.